In a huge victory for social justice and whole life advocates, who warned of the disastrous impact Trumpcare would have on the common good, the Republicans announced today that they are pulling the bill and moving on from healthcare, leaving Obamacare in place for the foreseeable future. Republican lawmakers lacked the votes to pass the measure, which caused deep internal divisions within the party and faced sharp criticism from the public.
The president of the Catholic Health Association, Sister Carol Keehan, says that the healthcare bill being debated in Congress, which would reduce maternity and pediatric care coverage and cost over 24 million people their health insurance, is a pro-life disaster. Access to quality, affordable healthcare is a human right:
Fr. Arturo Sosa, SJ, the Superior General of the Society of Jesus, in an interview with La Stampa:
What do you consider the most dangerous idol of contemporary West?
“Self-sufficiency, the idea of doing and knowing by yourself and for yourself, as individuals and as a society. Western society is convinced it can accomplish happiness, the fullness of humanity, on its own and by excluding the others. For this reason, it builds walls instead of bridges, and tries to isolate itself and withdraw into itself. This attitude is a great danger. The persuasion of being able to build humanity autonomously, without the need to learn and receive from others, leads to not respecting different cultures and peoples, nor creation, which is our common home. Self-sufficiency shuts off the possibility of intercultural and interreligious dialogue and stands in the way of our future. It is an idol that isolates and ends up being paralyzing. “
Pope Francis: “The throwaway culture is not of Jesus. The other is my brother, beyond every barrier of nationality, social extraction, or religion.”
via The Georgia Bulletin:
Recently the Jewish community in our country has been disturbed by a number of aggressive and offensive actions, including the desecration of cemeteries and sending of threatening messages to Jewish institutions. Such behavior is totally unacceptable and humanly pathetic. We should all be offended and repulsed by these actions. Wherever they occur, they threaten us all.
The rise of these activities embarrasses us as a nation and diminishes our worldwide public image. Especially, these actions should incite us all not only to denounce them but to stand shoulder to shoulder with our Jewish neighbors in calling for a strong legal response and action against the perpetrators. To ignore this behavior or to minimize its impact on our neighbors is a betrayal of our Christian heritage and social dignity.
There is no question that the current climate of increasingly bitter public discourse has invited such conduct on the part of some people. Hatred and bigotry are sins that continue to afflict too many people and can occasionally erupt violently in the public arena.
Whether our Jewish friends are the targets of violent hostility, or whether the victims are Muslims, Sikhs, immigrants, Christians or people who simply appear to be of a particular ethnic or racial class, we cannot remain silent—for such silence becomes consensus.
After briefly praising the anti-abortion provisions and possibility of greater flexibility in the AHCA, the USCCB write:
“Along with some positive aspects, the proposed law also contains some very troubling features. The Bishops have stressed that “all people and every family must be able to see clearly how they will fit within and access the health care system in a way that truly meets their needs.” Regarding access for those most in need, the AHCA includes changes which place many people at significant risk. The legislation must be modified to correct these serious flaws.
The recent CBO report indicates that, under the AHCA, as many as 24 million additional people could be uninsured in the next 10 years for a variety of reasons. Proposed modifications to the Medicaid program, a vital component of the social safety net, will have sweeping impacts, increasing economic and community costs while moving away from affordable access for all.
Furthermore, millions of people who would be eligible for Medicaid under current law will be negatively impacted due to reduced funding from the per capita cap system proposed in the legislation, according to the CBO. Those struggling families who currently receive Medicaid coverage from the recent expansion will see dramatic changes through the AHCA as well, without clear indication of affordable, adequate coverage to replace their current options. Many states begin their legislative sessions every cycle by attempting to overcome major deficits. State and local resources are unlikely to be sufficient to cover the gaps that will be created in the health care system as financial responsibility is further shifted to the states. Congress must rework the Medicaid-related provisions of the AHCA to fix these problems and ensure access for all, and especially for those most in need.
Other Provisions: Several other aspects of the AHCA must be addressed before passing the proposed legislation:
- The new tax credit system appears to create increased barriers to affordability, particularly for older and lower-income people when compared with the cost assistance found in the Affordable Care Act (ACA);
- Currently, the cost of plans for older Americans relative to plans for younger people is capped at a ratio of 3 to 1. This plan would increase that ratio to 5 to 1. Some studies show that premiums for older people on fixed incomes would rise, at times dramatically;
- The AHCA also puts in place a 30 percent surcharge for a twelve-month period for those who do not maintain continuous coverage. For those with limited means—a fact which often contributes to an inability to maintain coverage—this surcharge presents a serious challenge;
- Currently, states can empower hospitals to make a “presumptive eligibility determination” for Medicaid and enroll patients while a final determination is made. Ultimately, many of these people are found to be eligible for Medicaid. The AHCA would repeal this expanded authority for all but children, pregnant women and certain cancer patients. This state authority helps ensure a smooth transition into the Medicaid system, provides faster access to important health and treatment options, and reduces other costs borne by providers and the community;
- Under current law, states are required to afford individuals seeking Medicaid benefits a reasonable opportunity to establish that they are either U.S. citizens or have a qualified immigration status, during which time states cannot deny Medicaid benefits to such individuals who are otherwise eligible. Under the AHCA, states would no longer be required to provide services during this verification period. This change would undoubtedly threaten eligible individuals’ access to essential and early medical care.
- Absent in the AHCA are any changes to afford conscience protection against mandates to provide coverage or services, such as the regulatory interpretation of “preventive services” requiring contraception and sterilization coverage in almost all private health plans nationwide, which has been the subject of large-scale litigation especially involving religious entities like the Little Sisters of the Poor.”